12xc 100 percent dating
Now there was a person sitting down across from her, and she felt both excited and anxious.
The quiz that had brought them together was part of a multi-year study called the Marriage Pact, created by two Stanford students.
“People increase their bar because there’s this artificial belief of endless options.” Sterling-Angus, who was an economics major, and Mc Gregor, who studied computer science, had an idea: What if, rather than presenting people with a limitless array of attractive photos, they radically shrank the dating pool?
What if they gave people one match based on core values, rather than many matches based on interests (which can change) or physical attraction (which can fade)?
But it’s unclear if the project can scale beyond the bubble of elite college campuses, or if the algorithm, now operating among college students, contains the magic key to a stable marriage.
“I didn’t have to filter myself at all.” Coffee turned into lunch, and the pair decided to skip their afternoon classes to hang out. In 2000, psychologists Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper wrote a paper on the paradox of choice — the concept that having too many options can lead to decision paralysis.
The idea was to match people not based solely on similarities (unless that’s what a participant values in a relationship), but on complex compatibility questions.